Komentaryo sa 2 Mga Hari 5:20: From David to Destruction & Rashi

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר גֵּיחֲזִ֗י נַעַר֮ אֱלִישָׁ֣ע אִישׁ־הָאֱלֹהִים֒ הִנֵּ֣ה ׀ חָשַׂ֣ךְ אֲדֹנִ֗י אֶֽת־נַעֲמָ֤ן הָֽאֲרַמִּי֙ הַזֶּ֔ה מִקַּ֥חַת מִיָּד֖וֹ אֵ֣ת אֲשֶׁר־הֵבִ֑יא חַי־יְהוָה֙ כִּֽי־אִם־רַ֣צְתִּי אַחֲרָ֔יו וְלָקַחְתִּ֥י מֵאִתּ֖וֹ מְאֽוּמָה׃

Sinabi ni Gehazi, ang lingkod ni Eliseo na tao ng Diyos, “Narito, pinalampas ng aking panginoon ang Arameong si Naaman na ito, at hindi tinanggap mula sa kanyang kamay ang kanyang dinala. Kung paanong buháy ang Walang-Hanggan, tatakbo ako at hahabulin siya, at kukuha ako ng anuman mula sa kanya.”

From David to Destruction

What Goes Wrong?
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi

Something. The ‘א’ is missing,14The word “מְאוּמָה” is written “מוּמָה,” without the ‘א.’ מוּם means a flaw. As a result of this taking, he was stricken with Na’amon’s flaw, that of tzora’as. because this taking was [responsible for his being stricken with] a flaw [=[מום.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy